
Perhaps an initiative is taking longer than expected, a partnership depends too heavily on your team, or people support a goal but disagree about what happens next.
Priority-to-Progress begins with one specific piece of work. Use this guide to choose your priority and identify the decision you’d like help with.
You don’t need to know what’s causing the difficulty or which service to choose before contacting us.
Choose an initiative, partnership, implementation challenge, or upcoming decision that:
The work may already be underway, or you may want to examine readiness before making a commitment.

What important work needs attention over the next three to six months? Look for repeated difficulties or an approaching decision.
What is at stake? What happens if nothing changes? Choose the priority where better understanding would most help you make your next major decision.
Give one or two concrete examples. “Three partners missed important deadlines” is more useful than “Our partners aren’t committed.”
You don’t need to diagnose the cause.
Who makes decisions, provides resources, implements the work, or experiences its effects?
Include people whose cooperation matters even if you cannot direct them.
What would the inquiry help you decide? You might clarify responsibilities, redistribute work, change participation, or consider whether to proceed.
If you have a solution in mind, identify the question behind it. “We need a steering committee” becomes “How should these partners make decisions?”
Can you focus on one initiative, partnership, or phase? Is there a sponsor who can support the inquiry and act on findings? What evidence, perspectives, resources, or constraints should we understand?
"How can we collaborate better?
Becomes:
“Several teams are working toward the same goal, but their plans and timelines don’t align. We need to decide how to coordinate the next phase.”
"Why aren't our partners pulling their weight?"
Becomes:
“Our team completes most of the partnership’s agreed work. What should change before we renew?”
"Why did the community not respond well to our initiative?"
Becomes:
“We’re redesigning a program. How might community input more effectively influence our decisions?”
"Why don't partners use the data we collect?"
Becomes:
“We collect feedback and progress reports, but they rarely affect what we do next. We need to decide how findings will better inform our next round of planning.”
Use these four prompts:
A few sentences are enough.
Use this statement in your Priority Brief.
No. It can involve teams within one institution. What matters is that progress depends on people with different responsibilities, authority, or resources.
Yes. You may want to examine readiness before implementation. Explain what has been decided and what remains uncertain.
Start with the one where better understanding would most affect your next decision. Note the connections in your Priority Brief.
Describe what you’ve observed and tried. You don’t need a diagnosis, but you should be open to findings that suggest a different response.
Tell us what is available and what the sponsor can change. Those limits help determine scope and how confidently findings can be interpreted. Don’t upload internal records with your initial brief.
Describe it directly. Stronger coordination cannot replace missing resources or resolve binding restrictions. Another kind of support, a narrower inquiry, or a pause may be appropriate.
Tell us what matters, what you’re observing, and what you need to decide. Submitting a Priority Brief does not commit you to an engagement.
Prefer to begin on your own?
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.